Modern State Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Modern State - Essay ExampleThe concept and framework of the modern articulate is onerous to define because it involves a combination of historical, economic, political and cultural factors. Historical mythologies and memories are shared, traditional routes of pilgrimage start out united the nations of the continent in common religious bonds throughout history, and now they all share the same market (Morphet 517). It is possible to single out the following distinctive features of the modern state high take of topicism and multiculturalism, liberal institutions and importance of national refining, integrity and cooperation on the global level.Collective identity and respective(prenominal) freedom are the main characteristics of the modern state 9Richard Stillman II 23). The state is inevitably involved in recognizing and reproducing particular ethno-cultural groups, and so the politicization of cultural identities is, to some extent, inevitable. Modernization liberates people from fixed affectionate roles and traditional identities, and fosters an noble-minded of free individuation that encourages individuals to prefer choice and mobility over traditional ascriptive identities (Rubin 65). Modernization theorists argued that this ideal of autonomous individuality conflicts with a deep attachment to ones cultural group, particularly in the case of smaller nations or national minorities (Morphet 517). These smaller groups face strong economic and political pressures to assimilate into tumescentr nations, and theorists assumed that the members of these groups would accept this process, rather than fight to maintain their cultural identity at the price of economic well-being or social mobility. To resist assimilation would require an irrational attachment to an ascriptive group identity that was inconsistent with the modern ideal of autonomous individuality (Rubin 75). So there are many ways that government decisions play a crucial role in sustaining n ational cultures. This is not to say that governments can only promote one social culture. So nationalist movements by national minorities are not rejecting the dynamic of modernization and nation-building. The modern state accepts the idea that a modern economy and democratic community requires a diffused common culture (Rubin 64). They are simply arguing that they form their own distinct economy and society within the boundaries of the large state. They are arguing that some countries are not nation-states, but are multination states, containing two or to a greater extent national societies. In this case, democracy has two aspects, authorial and newspaper column democracy is authorial so furthermost as it gives the collective people direct or indirect control of government democracy is editorial so far as it gives people, whether in a collective or plural identity, the capacity to contest government decisions and as a feature of the plural people editorial democracy may be rep resentative, reactive or regulative in character (Pettit 527). Many liberal states do not organise nationalism per se, but they introduce common use of the term nation and are clearly sacred to a modern and unified administration, church-state reform, modern education and a liberal constitutional system. For instance, this is based on a general